<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: REVIEW &#8211; Lost Season 1 and 2 on Blu-Ray</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tvovermind.com/lost/review-lost-season-1-and-2-on-blu-ray/6054/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/lost/review-lost-season-1-and-2-on-blu-ray/6054</link>
	<description>Where TV Rules. News, Interviews, Recaps, Reviews, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:50:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chelsea</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/lost/review-lost-season-1-and-2-on-blu-ray/6054/comment-page-1#comment-2282</link>
		<dc:creator>Chelsea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=6054#comment-2282</guid>
		<description>Yes yes yes! Blu-ray is the ONLY way to watch LOST. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes yes yes! Blu-ray is the ONLY way to watch LOST.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benlinus</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/lost/review-lost-season-1-and-2-on-blu-ray/6054/comment-page-1#comment-2165</link>
		<dc:creator>benlinus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 09:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=6054#comment-2165</guid>
		<description>Yes, it is possible, and there are also instances where a pulldown flag is inserted for every 12 frames of film, this way, for every 24 frames of film, you get 50 fields of video. Thus, the soundtrack can be used at it original length and pitch. This is a bit of a new process however. The great thing about 1080p is that it promises to break the international pal/ntsc barrier. (souce:&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecine#2:2_pulldown&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wiki&lt;/a&gt;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is possible, and there are also instances where a pulldown flag is inserted for every 12 frames of film, this way, for every 24 frames of film, you get 50 fields of video. Thus, the soundtrack can be used at it original length and pitch. This is a bit of a new process however. The great thing about 1080p is that it promises to break the international pal/ntsc barrier. (souce:<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecine#2:2_pulldown" rel="nofollow">wiki</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/lost/review-lost-season-1-and-2-on-blu-ray/6054/comment-page-1#comment-2160</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 22:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=6054#comment-2160</guid>
		<description>It is possible to do pitch correction for the audio when the video has to be sped up to 25 fps, but it seems that this process is often skipped for the European versions of movies/TV shows. If one is willing to spend the time one can slow down the audio and restore the original framerate (or just pitch correct the audio) with a computer, but that takes a long time and could be illegal depending on the copyright laws in your country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is possible to do pitch correction for the audio when the video has to be sped up to 25 fps, but it seems that this process is often skipped for the European versions of movies/TV shows. If one is willing to spend the time one can slow down the audio and restore the original framerate (or just pitch correct the audio) with a computer, but that takes a long time and could be illegal depending on the copyright laws in your country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benlinus</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/lost/review-lost-season-1-and-2-on-blu-ray/6054/comment-page-1#comment-2142</link>
		<dc:creator>benlinus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 08:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=6054#comment-2142</guid>
		<description>I agree with you @ 200,00000000000000 %. The Bluray picture is beyond awesome, and here&#039;s another technical fact/improvement you can add to your list: 

Lost is shot on film at 24 frames per second (from now on, fps = frames per second).

Now when it airs on ABC, it is broadcast at 720p60, which means a resolution of 1280x720 at 59.94 fps. Yes, it is a progressive picture, but as you can see, it&#039;s a much higher frame rate than the original 24fps. This is achieved first by scanning the original film @ 23.976 fps and then by duplicating every odd frame once and every even frame twice. E.g, say you have two frames AB, they become AABBB. Also, 59.94/23,976=5/2. On your television set, you won&#039;t notice this, but it is a technical issue.

Now, on DVD, the film has to be &lt;strong&gt;telecined&lt;/strong&gt; ( more info http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecine ), which introduces telecine judder when played back at NTSC framerate (29.97 fps).

For people in Europe, this gets even worse, as your TV sets operate at 25fps, the whole film is scanned at 25 fps and in effect is sped up. Not only does this reduce the runtime, eg a 40 minute episode becomes 38 minutes and 24 seconds, but it also gives the audio a higher pitch. However, you don&#039;t to deal with telecine judder, since no telecine is performed on most PAL DVDs.

Which gets us back to BluRay; 1080p image, which is 2.25 times greater the area of a 720p image, losless studio sound, whether in PCM format, Dolby TrueHD or DTS-HD Master Audio, which are infinitely much better than their lossy DVD counterparts. Finally, you may ask, why that whole rant? Well, Bluray delivers the picture at 1080p24, which is the original frame rate at which it was shot. So, no telecine, no sped up audio or video. 

For arguments&#039; sake, one may say DVDs can store the picture at 23.976 fps, but keep in mind that if you play it back on a SDTV, it will be telecined on most TV sets. Well, you might say, I&#039;ll play it on my brand new HDTV, yes, you&#039;ll get the very close 23.976 fps framerate, but the image will be upsampled. 

So, all things considered, 1080p24 is the best out there that is commercially available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you @ 200,00000000000000 %. The Bluray picture is beyond awesome, and here's another technical fact/improvement you can add to your list: </p>
<p>Lost is shot on film at 24 frames per second (from now on, fps = frames per second).</p>
<p>Now when it airs on ABC, it is broadcast at 720p60, which means a resolution of 1280&#215;720 at 59.94 fps. Yes, it is a progressive picture, but as you can see, it's a much higher frame rate than the original 24fps. This is achieved first by scanning the original film @ 23.976 fps and then by duplicating every odd frame once and every even frame twice. E.g, say you have two frames AB, they become AABBB. Also, 59.94/23,976=5/2. On your television set, you won't notice this, but it is a technical issue.</p>
<p>Now, on DVD, the film has to be <strong>telecined</strong> ( more info <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecine" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecine</a> ), which introduces telecine judder when played back at NTSC framerate (29.97 fps).</p>
<p>For people in Europe, this gets even worse, as your TV sets operate at 25fps, the whole film is scanned at 25 fps and in effect is sped up. Not only does this reduce the runtime, eg a 40 minute episode becomes 38 minutes and 24 seconds, but it also gives the audio a higher pitch. However, you don't to deal with telecine judder, since no telecine is performed on most PAL DVDs.</p>
<p>Which gets us back to BluRay; 1080p image, which is 2.25 times greater the area of a 720p image, losless studio sound, whether in PCM format, Dolby TrueHD or DTS-HD Master Audio, which are infinitely much better than their lossy DVD counterparts. Finally, you may ask, why that whole rant? Well, Bluray delivers the picture at 1080p24, which is the original frame rate at which it was shot. So, no telecine, no sped up audio or video. </p>
<p>For arguments' sake, one may say DVDs can store the picture at 23.976 fps, but keep in mind that if you play it back on a SDTV, it will be telecined on most TV sets. Well, you might say, I'll play it on my brand new HDTV, yes, you'll get the very close 23.976 fps framerate, but the image will be upsampled. </p>
<p>So, all things considered, 1080p24 is the best out there that is commercially available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neoloki</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/lost/review-lost-season-1-and-2-on-blu-ray/6054/comment-page-1#comment-2124</link>
		<dc:creator>neoloki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 06:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=6054#comment-2124</guid>
		<description>I have also noticed the distortion or hiss during some of the dialogue which is particularly bad in season 2 and I even catch glimpses in season 3. I have a Pioneer 1018 so it&#039;s pretty good. I cheaped out though when I bought my TV over Christmas and have come to regret it recently, 720p Insignia. This fall I plan on buying a Samsung or Panasonic.  

But even with the limitations of my TV, Lost looks stunning on Blu-Ray.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have also noticed the distortion or hiss during some of the dialogue which is particularly bad in season 2 and I even catch glimpses in season 3. I have a Pioneer 1018 so it's pretty good. I cheaped out though when I bought my TV over Christmas and have come to regret it recently, 720p Insignia. This fall I plan on buying a Samsung or Panasonic.  </p>
<p>But even with the limitations of my TV, Lost looks stunning on Blu-Ray.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Lachonis</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/lost/review-lost-season-1-and-2-on-blu-ray/6054/comment-page-1#comment-2123</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Lachonis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=6054#comment-2123</guid>
		<description>Yipes!  You had to make me look! On my set, I&#039;m seeing some slight over saturation in some scenes... in particular, as you mention, the Moth.

The old LG was just bad.  I was happy to move on... I have a samsung now for my main set - one of the newer touch of color sets, no more blocks.  

I&#039;m guessing you have a surround sound with superior high end response compared to my own.  Mine is an older Toshiba, and has never had particularly great highs... which I would assume is where most of that hiss lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yipes!  You had to make me look! On my set, I'm seeing some slight over saturation in some scenes&#8230; in particular, as you mention, the Moth.</p>
<p>The old LG was just bad.  I was happy to move on&#8230; I have a samsung now for my main set &#8211; one of the newer touch of color sets, no more blocks.  </p>
<p>I'm guessing you have a surround sound with superior high end response compared to my own.  Mine is an older Toshiba, and has never had particularly great highs&#8230; which I would assume is where most of that hiss lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/lost/review-lost-season-1-and-2-on-blu-ray/6054/comment-page-1#comment-2122</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 01:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=6054#comment-2122</guid>
		<description>Ok, I suppose some displays do get blocky then. I&#039;m guessing you&#039;ve already tried this, but if there are any unnecessary image processing settings on your set I would try disabling them. On my display I disabled everything other than &quot;film mode&quot; (inverse 3:2 pulldown deinterlacing). 
I did a calibration of the user settings (aka not service menu) of my display using Digital Video Essentials on BD and it seems to be as close to standards as I can get it (with user settings). A good example of an over-saturated scene is Charlie&#039;s flashback in Liam&#039;s backyard in &quot;The Moth&quot;, and there are a few jungle scenes in other episodes as well. Other people on avsforum and various reviews noticed over-saturation as well, so I don&#039;t think it&#039;s my setup causing this. For the audio I have heard worse background distortion in other movies/TV shows, but I did find it somewhat noticeable. &quot;Man of Science, Man of Faith&quot; was particularly distorted in many scenes but the later episodes in season 2 are much better in terms of audio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I suppose some displays do get blocky then. I'm guessing you've already tried this, but if there are any unnecessary image processing settings on your set I would try disabling them. On my display I disabled everything other than "film mode" (inverse 3:2 pulldown deinterlacing).<br />
I did a calibration of the user settings (aka not service menu) of my display using Digital Video Essentials on BD and it seems to be as close to standards as I can get it (with user settings). A good example of an over-saturated scene is Charlie's flashback in Liam's backyard in "The Moth", and there are a few jungle scenes in other episodes as well. Other people on avsforum and various reviews noticed over-saturation as well, so I don't think it's my setup causing this. For the audio I have heard worse background distortion in other movies/TV shows, but I did find it somewhat noticeable. "Man of Science, Man of Faith" was particularly distorted in many scenes but the later episodes in season 2 are much better in terms of audio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Lachonis</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/lost/review-lost-season-1-and-2-on-blu-ray/6054/comment-page-1#comment-2119</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Lachonis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=6054#comment-2119</guid>
		<description>Hey Nick.  Actually - to extend the disagreement even further ;) -  I have an LG here that is 720p, and slow as crap.  When I have the ps3 hooked up, all my blu rays are blocky during fast motion.  It&#039;s all due to processing within the set designed to overcome.  I&#039;ve seen this debated all over the place, and in general everybody is right... depending on the set. Poor input is the most likely, but if the tv is older and relying on all sorts of &#039;software&#039; solutions to enhance the image problems can crop up.

Thanks for the additional comments on the set.  Personally, I didn&#039;t notice oversaturation at any point.  How is your set calibrated?  Astute note on the audio, although generally true on analog and again may be less noticeable depending depending on your surround sound. My setup has a soft high-end, and I don&#039;t get much hiss at all.  In this case, I definitely didn&#039;t notice it - so it is at worst not obvious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Nick.  Actually &#8211; to extend the disagreement even further <img src='http://www.tvovermind.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  &#8211;  I have an LG here that is 720p, and slow as crap.  When I have the ps3 hooked up, all my blu rays are blocky during fast motion.  It's all due to processing within the set designed to overcome.  I've seen this debated all over the place, and in general everybody is right&#8230; depending on the set. Poor input is the most likely, but if the tv is older and relying on all sorts of 'software' solutions to enhance the image problems can crop up.</p>
<p>Thanks for the additional comments on the set.  Personally, I didn't notice oversaturation at any point.  How is your set calibrated?  Astute note on the audio, although generally true on analog and again may be less noticeable depending depending on your surround sound. My setup has a soft high-end, and I don't get much hiss at all.  In this case, I definitely didn't notice it &#8211; so it is at worst not obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/lost/review-lost-season-1-and-2-on-blu-ray/6054/comment-page-1#comment-2118</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=6054#comment-2118</guid>
		<description>I disagree about the part where you say that some 1080p displays are &quot;too slow&quot; to display 1080p video properly. If the display is &quot;too slow&quot; it will have noticeable motion blur in the image, not a blocky image. A blocky image is usually in the source material itself and is often caused by the way it was compressed. (the video codec and bit-rate are the two main factors here)
For those curious about the actual image quality of Lost on BD, Season 1 is mostly good but with some dirt or specks in the frame occasionally while Season 2 is much &quot;cleaner&quot; but still not perfect. The audio is lossless (DTS-HD Master Audio, 5.1 channels, 48kHz/16-bit) and in season 1 is great but in season 2 some of the dialog has background hiss, but only for certain characters in certain scenes. (This was likely a recording problem) The video compression is very good, with only one compression artifact that I noticed in all of season 1. (and none in season 2 so far) Colours tend to be a bit oversaturated in season 1 but it&#039;s only occasionally distracting.
Both seasons are very worthwhile purchases, especially if you don&#039;t already have them on DVD. Here are some screenshots: http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showpost.php?p=16709182&amp;postcount=2160</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree about the part where you say that some 1080p displays are "too slow" to display 1080p video properly. If the display is "too slow" it will have noticeable motion blur in the image, not a blocky image. A blocky image is usually in the source material itself and is often caused by the way it was compressed. (the video codec and bit-rate are the two main factors here)<br />
For those curious about the actual image quality of Lost on BD, Season 1 is mostly good but with some dirt or specks in the frame occasionally while Season 2 is much "cleaner" but still not perfect. The audio is lossless (DTS-HD Master Audio, 5.1 channels, 48kHz/16-bit) and in season 1 is great but in season 2 some of the dialog has background hiss, but only for certain characters in certain scenes. (This was likely a recording problem) The video compression is very good, with only one compression artifact that I noticed in all of season 1. (and none in season 2 so far) Colours tend to be a bit oversaturated in season 1 but it's only occasionally distracting.<br />
Both seasons are very worthwhile purchases, especially if you don't already have them on DVD. Here are some screenshots: <a href="http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showpost.php?p=16709182&amp;postcount=2160" rel="nofollow">http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showpost.php?p=16709182&amp;postcount=2160</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Lachonis</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/lost/review-lost-season-1-and-2-on-blu-ray/6054/comment-page-1#comment-2115</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Lachonis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=6054#comment-2115</guid>
		<description>Well, sadly... they gave me little to work with.  As I say above, the extras are the same as the DVD extras and have not been enhanced.  However, as I also say above, the improvement in picture alone is worth the purchase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, sadly&#8230; they gave me little to work with.  As I say above, the extras are the same as the DVD extras and have not been enhanced.  However, as I also say above, the improvement in picture alone is worth the purchase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimD</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/lost/review-lost-season-1-and-2-on-blu-ray/6054/comment-page-1#comment-2114</link>
		<dc:creator>JimD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=6054#comment-2114</guid>
		<description>Well, maybe you could have talked about Lost ON Blu-ray....what&#039;s in the box, how it compares to DVD, etc.  You know...an actual REVIEW like the title says.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, maybe you could have talked about Lost ON Blu-ray&#8230;.what's in the box, how it compares to DVD, etc.  You know&#8230;an actual REVIEW like the title says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: professorstotch</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/lost/review-lost-season-1-and-2-on-blu-ray/6054/comment-page-1#comment-2110</link>
		<dc:creator>professorstotch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=6054#comment-2110</guid>
		<description>I only buy movies and shows on Blu-Ray that I know will look good on Blu-Ray. I buy things with good visuals, or awesome special effects and sound quality. My current Blu-Ray collection includes:

Band of Brothers, Planet Earth, The Dark Knight, Wanted, Transformers and Ghostbusters.

...ok, so Ghostbusters doesn&#039;t look amazing or anything like that, but it was $15 on Amazon, and less expensive than the DVD version. Who could pass up an offer like that?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only buy movies and shows on Blu-Ray that I know will look good on Blu-Ray. I buy things with good visuals, or awesome special effects and sound quality. My current Blu-Ray collection includes:</p>
<p>Band of Brothers, Planet Earth, The Dark Knight, Wanted, Transformers and Ghostbusters.</p>
<p>&#8230;ok, so Ghostbusters doesn't look amazing or anything like that, but it was $15 on Amazon, and less expensive than the DVD version. Who could pass up an offer like that?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Lachonis</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/lost/review-lost-season-1-and-2-on-blu-ray/6054/comment-page-1#comment-2109</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Lachonis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=6054#comment-2109</guid>
		<description>There is something to be said for using the PS3 as a blu ray, too.  I&#039;ve seen some blu ray specific content crap out on blu ray players, ps3 seems to be one of the most robust players.  Not surprising since the damn thing is practically a super computer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is something to be said for using the PS3 as a blu ray, too.  I've seen some blu ray specific content crap out on blu ray players, ps3 seems to be one of the most robust players.  Not surprising since the damn thing is practically a super computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: professorstotch</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/lost/review-lost-season-1-and-2-on-blu-ray/6054/comment-page-1#comment-2108</link>
		<dc:creator>professorstotch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=6054#comment-2108</guid>
		<description>I was almost in the same situation as you. November 2006, I waited in line two days in front of a Target store to be the first to get a PS3 on launch day because they were selling for thousands on eBay. After getting mine and selling it, I made about $150. 

Of course, I later bought my own last January.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was almost in the same situation as you. November 2006, I waited in line two days in front of a Target store to be the first to get a PS3 on launch day because they were selling for thousands on eBay. After getting mine and selling it, I made about $150. </p>
<p>Of course, I later bought my own last January.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Lachonis</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/lost/review-lost-season-1-and-2-on-blu-ray/6054/comment-page-1#comment-2107</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Lachonis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=6054#comment-2107</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t agree with you more.  There is definitely content that just isn&#039;t going to be enhanced by the format.  LOST seems built for it.  It is interesting to note that they have been mastering the show in 1080p from the beginning of production.  Not that these are ancient masters anyways, but it is not a case of the negative being pulled and re-transferred. It was always designed to be viewed in this format.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn't agree with you more.  There is definitely content that just isn't going to be enhanced by the format.  LOST seems built for it.  It is interesting to note that they have been mastering the show in 1080p from the beginning of production.  Not that these are ancient masters anyways, but it is not a case of the negative being pulled and re-transferred. It was always designed to be viewed in this format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mack</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/lost/review-lost-season-1-and-2-on-blu-ray/6054/comment-page-1#comment-2106</link>
		<dc:creator>Mack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=6054#comment-2106</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the review.  I have been waiting for a review before I considered buying Blu Ray


Blu Ray is another stop on the road of technological improvement.  Even now technologies are being developed that will make blu ray obsolete. For the cost, it just doesn&#039;t makes sense to buy blu ray for your average programs.  For example, what would be the point of buying all the seasons of Friends on blu ray.  For special effects laden films it makes perfect sense but for the everyday mundane television programing it makes little sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the review.  I have been waiting for a review before I considered buying Blu Ray</p>
<p>Blu Ray is another stop on the road of technological improvement.  Even now technologies are being developed that will make blu ray obsolete. For the cost, it just doesn't makes sense to buy blu ray for your average programs.  For example, what would be the point of buying all the seasons of Friends on blu ray.  For special effects laden films it makes perfect sense but for the everyday mundane television programing it makes little sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/lost/review-lost-season-1-and-2-on-blu-ray/6054/comment-page-1#comment-2105</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=6054#comment-2105</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re singing my song buddy!  I inadvertantly joined the Blu-Ray team when I failed to flip a new PS3 on ebay in November of 2006.  It has been my favorite toy ever since then.  I seldom play games on it. I use it primarily as a Blu-Ray players.

I have always been astounded by the quality differences between Blu-Ray and everything else.  Blu-Ray crushes all alternatives in terms of quality.  Downloads, upscaled DVDs, streaming media, Cable, Dish, nothing can top Blu-Ray for pure quality of video and audio.

What we have here is a case of sour grapes.  Those who invested heavily in DVD and/or cannot afford Blu-Ray are bitter that something better has come along.  They speak in a biased manner, befitting bitterness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You're singing my song buddy!  I inadvertantly joined the Blu-Ray team when I failed to flip a new PS3 on ebay in November of 2006.  It has been my favorite toy ever since then.  I seldom play games on it. I use it primarily as a Blu-Ray players.</p>
<p>I have always been astounded by the quality differences between Blu-Ray and everything else.  Blu-Ray crushes all alternatives in terms of quality.  Downloads, upscaled DVDs, streaming media, Cable, Dish, nothing can top Blu-Ray for pure quality of video and audio.</p>
<p>What we have here is a case of sour grapes.  Those who invested heavily in DVD and/or cannot afford Blu-Ray are bitter that something better has come along.  They speak in a biased manner, befitting bitterness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AstroJones</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/lost/review-lost-season-1-and-2-on-blu-ray/6054/comment-page-1#comment-2104</link>
		<dc:creator>AstroJones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=6054#comment-2104</guid>
		<description>I LOVE LOVE LOVE Band of Brothers.  I need to get my BluRay player first (already have the TV), but then I&#039;m definitely picking these up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LOVE LOVE LOVE Band of Brothers.  I need to get my BluRay player first (already have the TV), but then I'm definitely picking these up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Lachonis</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/lost/review-lost-season-1-and-2-on-blu-ray/6054/comment-page-1#comment-2103</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Lachonis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=6054#comment-2103</guid>
		<description>Well, not sure how much more you want?  I assume we all know what LOST is by now, making the case for why you should re-buy the same episodes and extras you bought 3-4 years ago rests, in my opinion, entirely in the technical merits.  The technical merits, as explained here, do make it worthwhile as LOST presents cinematography of natural beauty that expands along with the capabilities of the format it is shown in.  The show itself, has not changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, not sure how much more you want?  I assume we all know what LOST is by now, making the case for why you should re-buy the same episodes and extras you bought 3-4 years ago rests, in my opinion, entirely in the technical merits.  The technical merits, as explained here, do make it worthwhile as LOST presents cinematography of natural beauty that expands along with the capabilities of the format it is shown in.  The show itself, has not changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimD</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/lost/review-lost-season-1-and-2-on-blu-ray/6054/comment-page-1#comment-2102</link>
		<dc:creator>JimD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=6054#comment-2102</guid>
		<description>I thought this was going to be a review on Seasons 1 and 2 of Lost ON Blu-ray...NOT 1080p TV&#039;s and the Blu-ray format.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this was going to be a review on Seasons 1 and 2 of Lost ON Blu-ray&#8230;NOT 1080p TV's and the Blu-ray format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: professorstotch</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/lost/review-lost-season-1-and-2-on-blu-ray/6054/comment-page-1#comment-2100</link>
		<dc:creator>professorstotch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=6054#comment-2100</guid>
		<description>I agree with the fact that it&#039;s unbelievable how many people still think Blu-Ray is just a fad. The same was said about DVD, and now just about every home in America has a DVD player of some sort. I plan on buying Lost Season 5 on Blu-Ray in December. And if anyone out there&#039;s concerned about paying $1200+ for a Blu-Ray capable TV, last summer I bought a 22&#039; Blu-Ray capable 1080p monitor from Dell for $300, and it looks unreal.

And on a side note for all of you who are already on the HD/Blu-Ray train, consider buying Planet Earth or Band of Brothers on Blu-Ray. Both have the most amazing visuals you&#039;ll ever seen on a screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the fact that it's unbelievable how many people still think Blu-Ray is just a fad. The same was said about DVD, and now just about every home in America has a DVD player of some sort. I plan on buying Lost Season 5 on Blu-Ray in December. And if anyone out there's concerned about paying $1200+ for a Blu-Ray capable TV, last summer I bought a 22&#8242; Blu-Ray capable 1080p monitor from Dell for $300, and it looks unreal.</p>
<p>And on a side note for all of you who are already on the HD/Blu-Ray train, consider buying Planet Earth or Band of Brothers on Blu-Ray. Both have the most amazing visuals you'll ever seen on a screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LOST Blu-Ray Review DocArzt&#8217;s LOST Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/lost/review-lost-season-1-and-2-on-blu-ray/6054/comment-page-1#comment-2098</link>
		<dc:creator>LOST Blu-Ray Review DocArzt&#8217;s LOST Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=6054#comment-2098</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the full review here        Stay LOST! Follow Us -            Whispers From The Forums  &amp;bull [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the full review here        Stay LOST! Follow Us &#8211;            Whispers From The Forums  &amp;bull [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
