<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Has ABC Finally Figured Out How to Market Sci-Fi with V?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tvovermind.com/tv-news/has-abc-finally-figured-out-how-to-market-sci-fi-with-v/12068/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/tv-news/has-abc-finally-figured-out-how-to-market-sci-fi-with-v/12068?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=has-abc-finally-figured-out-how-to-market-sci-fi-with-v</link>
	<description>TV News, Reviews, Recaps, and Spoilers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:38:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/tv-news/has-abc-finally-figured-out-how-to-market-sci-fi-with-v/12068#comment-4724</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=12068#comment-4724</guid>
		<description>The problem with Defying Gravity was that it was too smart for ABC, I will go out on a limb and say .........it was much too smart for the reality based show crowd that ABC caters to......period.  Defying Gravity required you to think, to keep track of events because it became very important how history made reality on the ship Anteras sink in for the astronauts on board.  If you didn&#039;t &quot;get it&quot; with Defying Gravity, you are not really cut out for hard core sci-fi.  If you didn&#039;t find the characters interesting enough or the pace of the show fast enough, then you most likely need someone to be voted off the ship every week, or a new couple to learn a dance routine on the forward observation deck, or Wassenfelder to become the next Outer Space Idol.   
 
You had to THINK and watch this show.  Not get your boxers in a wad about things that you couldn&#039;t change with a show that was 13 episodes into the series and the air rights sold.  People needed to sit back and let the information sink in.  The depth of the show was completely lost to many, the gutsy move for the writers to project future society issues and environmental problems were cutting edge. The problem with the US viewers is obvious, a hard core group of around 3 millions were hooked, the rest wanted something that required no chance of brain cells becoming involved. 
 
I won&#039;t blame it all on the downward spiral of TV offerings in general.  The obvious attempt and downright smoking gun that ABC holds with Defying Gravity as the victim is apalling.  To spell it out, ABC bought this show to kill it, quickly. You do not have to be an advertising executive to understand this:  if you do not show a single TV ad for a show 7 days after you air the first episode, then you are killing it.  ABC bought this show as a filler, and with full knowledge that they wanted the two garbage shows Flash-crap and V=laughable, to not be upstaged with something that actually was deeper than a 5th grader&#039;s thought pattern. 
 
It television politics at its worst and shown in detail.  ABC has just shown millions of viewers that they will cut the throat of competeition even if they have to buy it and bleed it death themselves.  I may be just one person, but I dare say that there are several million viewers who are more than fed-up with ABC-  and word travels fast amongst loyal fans. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with Defying Gravity was that it was too smart for ABC, I will go out on a limb and say &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;it was much too smart for the reality based show crowd that ABC caters to&#8230;&#8230;period.  Defying Gravity required you to think, to keep track of events because it became very important how history made reality on the ship Anteras sink in for the astronauts on board.  If you didn&#039;t &quot;get it&quot; with Defying Gravity, you are not really cut out for hard core sci-fi.  If you didn&#039;t find the characters interesting enough or the pace of the show fast enough, then you most likely need someone to be voted off the ship every week, or a new couple to learn a dance routine on the forward observation deck, or Wassenfelder to become the next Outer Space Idol.  </p>
<p>You had to THINK and watch this show.  Not get your boxers in a wad about things that you couldn&#039;t change with a show that was 13 episodes into the series and the air rights sold.  People needed to sit back and let the information sink in.  The depth of the show was completely lost to many, the gutsy move for the writers to project future society issues and environmental problems were cutting edge. The problem with the US viewers is obvious, a hard core group of around 3 millions were hooked, the rest wanted something that required no chance of brain cells becoming involved.</p>
<p>I won&#039;t blame it all on the downward spiral of TV offerings in general.  The obvious attempt and downright smoking gun that ABC holds with Defying Gravity as the victim is apalling.  To spell it out, ABC bought this show to kill it, quickly. You do not have to be an advertising executive to understand this:  if you do not show a single TV ad for a show 7 days after you air the first episode, then you are killing it.  ABC bought this show as a filler, and with full knowledge that they wanted the two garbage shows Flash-crap and V=laughable, to not be upstaged with something that actually was deeper than a 5th grader&#039;s thought pattern.</p>
<p>It television politics at its worst and shown in detail.  ABC has just shown millions of viewers that they will cut the throat of competeition even if they have to buy it and bleed it death themselves.  I may be just one person, but I dare say that there are several million viewers who are more than fed-up with ABC-  and word travels fast amongst loyal fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/tv-news/has-abc-finally-figured-out-how-to-market-sci-fi-with-v/12068#comment-21222</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=12068#comment-21222</guid>
		<description>The problem with Defying Gravity was that it was too smart for ABC, I will go out on a limb and say .........it was much too smart for the reality based show crowd that ABC caters to......period.  Defying Gravity required you to think, to keep track of events because it became very important how history made reality on the ship Anteras sink in for the astronauts on board.  If you didn&#039;t &quot;get it&quot; with Defying Gravity, you are not really cut out for hard core sci-fi.  If you didn&#039;t find the characters interesting enough or the pace of the show fast enough, then you most likely need someone to be voted off the ship every week, or a new couple to learn a dance routine on the forward observation deck, or Wassenfelder to become the next Outer Space Idol.  

You had to THINK and watch this show.  Not get your boxers in a wad about things that you couldn&#039;t change with a show that was 13 episodes into the series and the air rights sold.  People needed to sit back and let the information sink in.  The depth of the show was completely lost to many, the gutsy move for the writers to project future society issues and environmental problems were cutting edge. The problem with the US viewers is obvious, a hard core group of around 3 millions were hooked, the rest wanted something that required no chance of brain cells becoming involved.

I won&#039;t blame it all on the downward spiral of TV offerings in general.  The obvious attempt and downright smoking gun that ABC holds with Defying Gravity as the victim is apalling.  To spell it out, ABC bought this show to kill it, quickly. You do not have to be an advertising executive to understand this:  if you do not show a single TV ad for a show 7 days after you air the first episode, then you are killing it.  ABC bought this show as a filler, and with full knowledge that they wanted the two garbage shows Flash-crap and V=laughable, to not be upstaged with something that actually was deeper than a 5th grader&#039;s thought pattern.

It television politics at its worst and shown in detail.  ABC has just shown millions of viewers that they will cut the throat of competeition even if they have to buy it and bleed it death themselves.  I may be just one person, but I dare say that there are several million viewers who are more than fed-up with ABC-  and word travels fast amongst loyal fans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with Defying Gravity was that it was too smart for ABC, I will go out on a limb and say &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;it was much too smart for the reality based show crowd that ABC caters to&#8230;&#8230;period.  Defying Gravity required you to think, to keep track of events because it became very important how history made reality on the ship Anteras sink in for the astronauts on board.  If you didn&#8217;t &#8220;get it&#8221; with Defying Gravity, you are not really cut out for hard core sci-fi.  If you didn&#8217;t find the characters interesting enough or the pace of the show fast enough, then you most likely need someone to be voted off the ship every week, or a new couple to learn a dance routine on the forward observation deck, or Wassenfelder to become the next Outer Space Idol.  </p>
<p>You had to THINK and watch this show.  Not get your boxers in a wad about things that you couldn&#8217;t change with a show that was 13 episodes into the series and the air rights sold.  People needed to sit back and let the information sink in.  The depth of the show was completely lost to many, the gutsy move for the writers to project future society issues and environmental problems were cutting edge. The problem with the US viewers is obvious, a hard core group of around 3 millions were hooked, the rest wanted something that required no chance of brain cells becoming involved.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t blame it all on the downward spiral of TV offerings in general.  The obvious attempt and downright smoking gun that ABC holds with Defying Gravity as the victim is apalling.  To spell it out, ABC bought this show to kill it, quickly. You do not have to be an advertising executive to understand this:  if you do not show a single TV ad for a show 7 days after you air the first episode, then you are killing it.  ABC bought this show as a filler, and with full knowledge that they wanted the two garbage shows Flash-crap and V=laughable, to not be upstaged with something that actually was deeper than a 5th grader&#8217;s thought pattern.</p>
<p>It television politics at its worst and shown in detail.  ABC has just shown millions of viewers that they will cut the throat of competeition even if they have to buy it and bleed it death themselves.  I may be just one person, but I dare say that there are several million viewers who are more than fed-up with ABC-  and word travels fast amongst loyal fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/tv-news/has-abc-finally-figured-out-how-to-market-sci-fi-with-v/12068#comment-4712</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=12068#comment-4712</guid>
		<description>Agree with DaveP.  Stories exploring the human condition are the basis of great sci-fi and drama stories.  LevT obviously missed that.  DG&#039;s initial episodes (plural- meaning more than one single episode) are comparable to  good wine and needed time to breathe in order for the characterization to make sense to the storyline. 
 
ABC didn&#039;t get it right with DG (the buyers from ABC called it &quot;Grey&#039;s Anatomy in Space&quot;- dear lord) and they will fail with V by putting it into hiatus with four episodes under its belt. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with DaveP.  Stories exploring the human condition are the basis of great sci-fi and drama stories.  LevT obviously missed that.  DG&#039;s initial episodes (plural- meaning more than one single episode) are comparable to  good wine and needed time to breathe in order for the characterization to make sense to the storyline.</p>
<p>ABC didn&#039;t get it right with DG (the buyers from ABC called it &quot;Grey&#039;s Anatomy in Space&quot;- dear lord) and they will fail with V by putting it into hiatus with four episodes under its belt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/tv-news/has-abc-finally-figured-out-how-to-market-sci-fi-with-v/12068#comment-21221</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=12068#comment-21221</guid>
		<description>Agree with DaveP.  Stories exploring the human condition are the basis of great sci-fi and drama stories.  LevT obviously missed that.  DG&#039;s initial episodes (plural- meaning more than one single episode) are comparable to  good wine and needed time to breathe in order for the characterization to make sense to the storyline.

ABC didn&#039;t get it right with DG (the buyers from ABC called it &quot;Grey&#039;s Anatomy in Space&quot;- dear lord) and they will fail with V by putting it into hiatus with four episodes under its belt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with DaveP.  Stories exploring the human condition are the basis of great sci-fi and drama stories.  LevT obviously missed that.  DG&#8217;s initial episodes (plural- meaning more than one single episode) are comparable to  good wine and needed time to breathe in order for the characterization to make sense to the storyline.</p>
<p>ABC didn&#8217;t get it right with DG (the buyers from ABC called it &#8220;Grey&#8217;s Anatomy in Space&#8221;- dear lord) and they will fail with V by putting it into hiatus with four episodes under its belt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LevT</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/tv-news/has-abc-finally-figured-out-how-to-market-sci-fi-with-v/12068#comment-4570</link>
		<dc:creator>LevT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=12068#comment-4570</guid>
		<description>&quot;At its core, Defying Gravity was a character drama that explored the human condition and had themes rooted deeply in fate and our role in the universe that happened to be set in space&quot; 
 
If that was the mission statement of the show it sucked at it. Yes it was focused more on the characters than anything else and that can lead to a very good show when the characters are interesting. That wasn&#039;t the case here. With it&#039;s cliched carboard cutout characters the show had no chance. And advertising for the show was no issue since I don&#039;t pay any attention to them. I hadn&#039;t even realised 24 was on until after the first season was finished. So I started watching this without hearing the &#039;Grey&#039;s Anatomy in space&#039; description. After the first episode was finished I was 100% sure that it would get cancelled. So I will not blame ABC for cancelling DG. I&#039;ll blame them for funding it in the first place. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;At its core, Defying Gravity was a character drama that explored the human condition and had themes rooted deeply in fate and our role in the universe that happened to be set in space&quot;</p>
<p>If that was the mission statement of the show it sucked at it. Yes it was focused more on the characters than anything else and that can lead to a very good show when the characters are interesting. That wasn&#039;t the case here. With it&#039;s cliched carboard cutout characters the show had no chance. And advertising for the show was no issue since I don&#039;t pay any attention to them. I hadn&#039;t even realised 24 was on until after the first season was finished. So I started watching this without hearing the &#039;Grey&#039;s Anatomy in space&#039; description. After the first episode was finished I was 100% sure that it would get cancelled. So I will not blame ABC for cancelling DG. I&#039;ll blame them for funding it in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LevT</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/tv-news/has-abc-finally-figured-out-how-to-market-sci-fi-with-v/12068#comment-21220</link>
		<dc:creator>LevT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=12068#comment-21220</guid>
		<description>&quot;At its core, Defying Gravity was a character drama that explored the human condition and had themes rooted deeply in fate and our role in the universe that happened to be set in space&quot;

If that was the mission statement of the show it sucked at it. Yes it was focused more on the characters than anything else and that can lead to a very good show when the characters are interesting. That wasn&#039;t the case here. With it&#039;s cliched carboard cutout characters the show had no chance. And advertising for the show was no issue since I don&#039;t pay any attention to them. I hadn&#039;t even realised 24 was on until after the first season was finished. So I started watching this without hearing the &#039;Grey&#039;s Anatomy in space&#039; description. After the first episode was finished I was 100% sure that it would get cancelled. So I will not blame ABC for cancelling DG. I&#039;ll blame them for funding it in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;At its core, Defying Gravity was a character drama that explored the human condition and had themes rooted deeply in fate and our role in the universe that happened to be set in space&#8221;</p>
<p>If that was the mission statement of the show it sucked at it. Yes it was focused more on the characters than anything else and that can lead to a very good show when the characters are interesting. That wasn&#8217;t the case here. With it&#8217;s cliched carboard cutout characters the show had no chance. And advertising for the show was no issue since I don&#8217;t pay any attention to them. I hadn&#8217;t even realised 24 was on until after the first season was finished. So I started watching this without hearing the &#8216;Grey&#8217;s Anatomy in space&#8217; description. After the first episode was finished I was 100% sure that it would get cancelled. So I will not blame ABC for cancelling DG. I&#8217;ll blame them for funding it in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveP</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/tv-news/has-abc-finally-figured-out-how-to-market-sci-fi-with-v/12068#comment-4563</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=12068#comment-4563</guid>
		<description>Defying Gravity was good science fiction in the tradition of Ray Bradbury.  It was about human interaction and experience, set in a venue that challenged and stimulated the imagination.  But because it didn&#039;t have talking lizards or aliens to blast with exotic weapons, ABC didn&#039;t know what to do with it.  I hear that it&#039;s been reported that the sets for DG have been destroyed.  pity. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Defying Gravity was good science fiction in the tradition of Ray Bradbury.  It was about human interaction and experience, set in a venue that challenged and stimulated the imagination.  But because it didn&#039;t have talking lizards or aliens to blast with exotic weapons, ABC didn&#039;t know what to do with it.  I hear that it&#039;s been reported that the sets for DG have been destroyed.  pity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveP</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/tv-news/has-abc-finally-figured-out-how-to-market-sci-fi-with-v/12068#comment-21219</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=12068#comment-21219</guid>
		<description>Defying Gravity was good science fiction in the tradition of Ray Bradbury.  It was about human interaction and experience, set in a venue that challenged and stimulated the imagination.  But because it didn&#039;t have talking lizards or aliens to blast with exotic weapons, ABC didn&#039;t know what to do with it.  I hear that it&#039;s been reported that the sets for DG have been destroyed.  pity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Defying Gravity was good science fiction in the tradition of Ray Bradbury.  It was about human interaction and experience, set in a venue that challenged and stimulated the imagination.  But because it didn&#8217;t have talking lizards or aliens to blast with exotic weapons, ABC didn&#8217;t know what to do with it.  I hear that it&#8217;s been reported that the sets for DG have been destroyed.  pity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Featherlite</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/tv-news/has-abc-finally-figured-out-how-to-market-sci-fi-with-v/12068#comment-4546</link>
		<dc:creator>Featherlite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=12068#comment-4546</guid>
		<description>Well, they&#039;ve got the advertising for &quot;V&quot; down, I&#039;ll give them that.  Let&#039;s wait and see what they do with the scheduling.  If we get four episodes and the series vanishes for weeks or months, I think we&#039;ll have an answer to your titular question. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, they&#039;ve got the advertising for &quot;V&quot; down, I&#039;ll give them that.  Let&#039;s wait and see what they do with the scheduling.  If we get four episodes and the series vanishes for weeks or months, I think we&#039;ll have an answer to your titular question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Featherlite</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/tv-news/has-abc-finally-figured-out-how-to-market-sci-fi-with-v/12068#comment-21218</link>
		<dc:creator>Featherlite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=12068#comment-21218</guid>
		<description>Well, they&#039;ve got the advertising for &quot;V&quot; down, I&#039;ll give them that.  Let&#039;s wait and see what they do with the scheduling.  If we get four episodes and the series vanishes for weeks or months, I think we&#039;ll have an answer to your titular question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, they&#8217;ve got the advertising for &#8220;V&#8221; down, I&#8217;ll give them that.  Let&#8217;s wait and see what they do with the scheduling.  If we get four episodes and the series vanishes for weeks or months, I think we&#8217;ll have an answer to your titular question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/tv-news/has-abc-finally-figured-out-how-to-market-sci-fi-with-v/12068#comment-4543</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=12068#comment-4543</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with DGfangirl all the way.  Defying Gravity is just about the most original and satisfying bit of Sci-Fi and human drama out there.  It is inconceivable to me that ABC want to drop what could be an absolute winner, if they got their marketing together... ABC, you&#039;re in my bad books also...&#039;V&#039;?  Nice idea, but it&#039;s been done before; Defying Gravity was a new concept and, in my mind, the best of it&#039;s breed.  Bring it back. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m with DGfangirl all the way.  Defying Gravity is just about the most original and satisfying bit of Sci-Fi and human drama out there.  It is inconceivable to me that ABC want to drop what could be an absolute winner, if they got their marketing together&#8230; ABC, you&#039;re in my bad books also&#8230;&#039;V&#039;?  Nice idea, but it&#039;s been done before; Defying Gravity was a new concept and, in my mind, the best of it&#039;s breed.  Bring it back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/tv-news/has-abc-finally-figured-out-how-to-market-sci-fi-with-v/12068#comment-21217</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=12068#comment-21217</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with DGfangirl all the way.  Defying Gravity is just about the most original and satisfying bit of Sci-Fi and human drama out there.  It is inconceivable to me that ABC want to drop what could be an absolute winner, if they got their marketing together... ABC, you&#039;re in my bad books also...&#039;V&#039;?  Nice idea, but it&#039;s been done before; Defying Gravity was a new concept and, in my mind, the best of it&#039;s breed.  Bring it back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with DGfangirl all the way.  Defying Gravity is just about the most original and satisfying bit of Sci-Fi and human drama out there.  It is inconceivable to me that ABC want to drop what could be an absolute winner, if they got their marketing together&#8230; ABC, you&#8217;re in my bad books also&#8230;&#8217;V'?  Nice idea, but it&#8217;s been done before; Defying Gravity was a new concept and, in my mind, the best of it&#8217;s breed.  Bring it back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DGfangirl</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/tv-news/has-abc-finally-figured-out-how-to-market-sci-fi-with-v/12068#comment-4531</link>
		<dc:creator>DGfangirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=12068#comment-4531</guid>
		<description>Sadly beacause of the way ABC treated Defying Gravity I have boycotted there station as well as the new upcoming &quot;V&quot;. Sorry but until they bring back DG ABC is on my bad side...now ABC get your act together bring back DG with all the promotion force your giving your remake of &quot;v&quot;.Great article! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly beacause of the way ABC treated Defying Gravity I have boycotted there station as well as the new upcoming &quot;V&quot;. Sorry but until they bring back DG ABC is on my bad side&#8230;now ABC get your act together bring back DG with all the promotion force your giving your remake of &quot;v&quot;.Great article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DGfangirl</title>
		<link>http://www.tvovermind.com/tv-news/has-abc-finally-figured-out-how-to-market-sci-fi-with-v/12068#comment-21216</link>
		<dc:creator>DGfangirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvovermind.com/?p=12068#comment-21216</guid>
		<description>Sadly beacause of the way ABC treated Defying Gravity I have boycotted there station as well as the new upcoming &quot;V&quot;. Sorry but until they bring back DG ABC is on my bad side...now ABC get your act together bring back DG with all the promotion force your giving your remake of &quot;v&quot;.Great article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly beacause of the way ABC treated Defying Gravity I have boycotted there station as well as the new upcoming &#8220;V&#8221;. Sorry but until they bring back DG ABC is on my bad side&#8230;now ABC get your act together bring back DG with all the promotion force your giving your remake of &#8220;v&#8221;.Great article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Content Delivery Network via cdn.tvovermind.com

Served from: www.tvovermind.com @ 2012-02-13 10:40:12 -->
